Case Stats

  • This gives referring lawyers and the outside world the exact same information we use in-house for quality control. Intakes need to be accepted / declined and cases need to be resolved! Justice delayed is justice denied.
  • 2017 Intake Contacts 627 (as of 8/7)
  • 2017 Intakes Declined 578 (as of 8/7)
  • All Intakes Under Investigation 68 (as of 8/7)
  • 2017 Accepted/Filed Cases 25
  • Total Pending Cases 170
  • Referred Cases from other lawyers state and nationwide 94%
  • Median Time First Contact to Decline 25 days (most cases are reviewed w/ an indication of merit within 72 hours)
  • Median Time First Contact to Accepted/Filed Cases 9 weeks
  • Median Time Case Filing to Resolution 1.8 years

archive for January, 2015


  • Faxon Law Group Files 64th Case Against St. Francis Hospital

    John Doe v. St. Francis Hospital (filed January 3, 2015)  We filed our 64th case against St. Francis hospital arising out of the exploits of serial, multi-decade pedophile Dr. George Reardon.  John Doe 46 was a minor patient in Reardon’s bogus growth study–with no supervision–which spanned the decades of the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s with total ignorance on the part of St. Francis.  John Doe 46 was photographed and repeatedly sexually molested by St. Francis’ Chief of Endocrinology, Dr. George Reardon on multiple occasions on the premises of the hospital in the early 1980s.

  • Patient Awakes to Molestation by Hospital Employee

    Villanueva v. St. Vincent’s Medical Center (Bridgeport Superior Court – filed Dec 19, 2014) The plaintiff, a middle-aged man with liver disease, was a patient at St. Vincent’s in May of 2013 where he awoke to a hospital employee sexually assaulting him. Gonzalo Flores, a 51-year-old certified nursing assistant who was hired by St. Vincent’s in August of 2011, was investigated by the hospital after a previous patient made a formal complainant regarding similar sexual misconduct but the hospital not only took no action, they continued to allow Flores access to patients with no supervision or warning to others, similar MORE

How to Use Case Builder

Case Builder contains two helpful categories: cases we are working on now and our past results. Case Builder is a novel concept. Our web designer said we should have this information fixed in a web page. We disagreed—thinking that just like our practice is always changing the case builder should be an ever-changing description of where we are right now—not last month or a year ago.

Current Cases

Past Results

National Board of Trial Advocacy

US News Best Law Firms 2017

US News Best Law Firms 2017

Super Lawyers Top 50 New England Lawyers

Super Lawyers Top 10 Connecticut Lawyers

Martin Hubbell Peer Review Rated

CLTA Board of Govenors