Case Stats

  • This gives referring lawyers and the outside world the exact same information we use in-house for quality control. Intakes need to be accepted / declined and cases need to be resolved! Justice delayed is justice denied.
  • 2019 Total Intake Contacts 149   (as of 3/5)
  • 2019 Total Intakes Declined 122 (as of 3/5)
  • All Intakes Under Investigation 41 (as of 3/5)
  • 2019 Accepted/Filed Cases 6 
  • Total Pending Cases 159 
  • Referred Cases from other lawyers state and nationwide 94%
  • Median Time First Contact to Decline 25 days (most cases are reviewed w/ an indication of merit within 72 hours)
  • Median Time First Contact to Accepted/Filed Cases 9 weeks
  • Median Time Case Filing to Resolution 1.8 years

Christopher Baviello, et. al. v. Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. and Dylan Esposito  (Bridgeport Superior Court–filed June 25, 2018)  Wallingford Police were called to a workplace accident on private property. Upon arriving at the scene they found the decedent, David Baviello, unresponsive and face down on asphalt with a fatal head wound. While performing snow removal duties, Baviello, a pedestrian wearing a highly visible fluorescent yellow safety vest, was struck and killed by a Caterpillar front end loader with a plow attachment, owned and operated by Cherry Hill Construction. Baviello was only 29 at the time of his death. Esposito, the driver of the front loader was under of the influence of drugs at the time he struck Mr. Baviello. Esposito’s failure to keep a proper lookout, take reasonable safety measures when operating a commercial machine, and driving this vehicle while impaired caused Mr. Baviello’s death. In addition, Cherry Hill Construction was highly negligent in training, hiring, and supervising Esposito, who had a history of motor vehicle violations, criminal misconduct and illicit drug abuse. Our client’s family has suffered a tremendous loss, and incurred expenses for their loved one’s funeral and burial expenses, as a result of a completely preventable tragedy.

Post a Comment

How to Use Case Builder

Case Builder contains two helpful categories: cases we are working on now and our past results. Case Builder is a novel concept. Our web designer said we should have this information fixed in a web page. We disagreed—thinking that just like our practice is always changing the case builder should be an ever-changing description of where we are right now—not last month or a year ago.

Current Cases

Past Results

National Board of Trial Advocacy

US News Best Law Firms 2017

Super Lawyers Top 50 New England Lawyers

Super Lawyers Top 10 Connecticut Lawyers

Martin Hubbell Peer Review Rated

CLTA Board of Govenors