Case Stats

  • This gives referring lawyers and the outside world the exact same information we use in-house for quality control. Intakes need to be accepted / declined and cases need to be resolved! Justice delayed is justice denied.
  • 2022 Intake Contacts (12/31/22) 647
  • 2022 Declined (12/31/22) 522
  • Intakes Under Review 45 (12/31/22)
  • Referred Cases from other lawyers state and nationwide 94%
  • Median Time First Contact to Decline 25 days (most cases are reviewed w/ an indication of merit within 72 hours)
  • Median Time First Contact to Accepted/Filed Cases 9 weeks
  • Median Time Case Filing to Resolution 1.8 years

Miller v. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Menopause Physicians P.C. and Hanson, M.D. (Filed in New Haven 2011)

The defendant prescribed Estradiol at increasingly high doses to the plaintiff. During this time, the doctor did nothing to follow up on complaints of persistent spotting. Two years after the complaints began the plaintiff was finally diagnosed with stage iv uterine cancer. The gynecologist who reviewed the records here, for us, is board certified and has worked with women like the plaintiff for 17 years. She authored a report concluding that the defendant deviated from the standard of care by not ordering an endometrial biopsy when the patient first complained and by prescribing excessively high levels of estrogen.


Enhanced by Zemanta

How to Use Case Builder

Case Builder contains two helpful categories: cases we are working on now and our past results. Case Builder is a novel concept. Our web designer said we should have this information fixed in a web page. We disagreed—thinking that just like our practice is always changing the case builder should be an ever-changing description of where we are right now—not last month or a year ago.

Current Cases

Past Results

National Board of Trial Advocacy

US News Best Law Firms 2017

Super Lawyers Top 50 New England Lawyers

Super Lawyers Top 10 Connecticut Lawyers

Martin Hubbell Peer Review Rated

CLTA Board of Govenors