Case Stats

  • This gives referring lawyers and the outside world the exact same information we use in-house for quality control. Intakes need to be accepted / declined and cases need to be resolved! Justice delayed is justice denied.
  • 2022 Intake Contacts (4/8/22) 170
  • 2022 Declined (4/8/22) 128
  • Intakes Under Review 39 (4/8/22)
  • Referred Cases from other lawyers state and nationwide 94%
  • Median Time First Contact to Decline 25 days (most cases are reviewed w/ an indication of merit within 72 hours)
  • Median Time First Contact to Accepted/Filed Cases 9 weeks
  • Median Time Case Filing to Resolution 1.8 years

Castros v. Vukson, (JD of Stamford – filed October 10, 2013) The plaintiff has gone through extensive back and neck surgeries since a very damaging fall in a parking lot owned by the defendant. The parking area where this occurred had a combination of slick surface and large cracks that made it particularly dangerous for people carrying heavy items. The surface was slick because of years of accumulated oil and grease. The lot is right outside an auto parts store and standard practice is to periodically lay down a degreaser. This was never done.  While carrying supplies from the store, the plaintiff tripped on a crack and then slipped on the grease–going down and severely injuring his back which is now fully fused.

How to Use Case Builder

Case Builder contains two helpful categories: cases we are working on now and our past results. Case Builder is a novel concept. Our web designer said we should have this information fixed in a web page. We disagreed—thinking that just like our practice is always changing the case builder should be an ever-changing description of where we are right now—not last month or a year ago.

Current Cases

Past Results

National Board of Trial Advocacy

US News Best Law Firms 2017

Super Lawyers Top 50 New England Lawyers

Super Lawyers Top 10 Connecticut Lawyers

Martin Hubbell Peer Review Rated

CLTA Board of Govenors